Consenso sobre el tratamiento neuroquirúrgico de las metástasis intracraneales elaborado por el Grupo de Trabajo de Neurooncología (GTNO) de la Sociedad Española de Neurocirugía / Brain metastasis treatment guidelines: Consensus by the Spanish Society of Neurosurgery Tumor Section

Las metástasis cerebrales (MC) son tumores que se forman a partir de una célula tumoral originada en otro órgano y que a través de la sangre llega al cerebro donde es capaz de crecer e invadir los tejidos vecinos, como meninges y hueso. En la mayor parte de los pacientes existe un tumor conocido cuando se diagnostica la lesión cerebral, aunque es posible que el tumor del cerebro sea el primer hallazgo antes de que se tenga evidencia de la patología oncológica en otro lugar del organismo. Por este motivo, el neurocirujano debe conocer el manejo que ha demostrado mayor beneficio para estos sujetos, de manera que se agilicen y optimicen los tratamientos. Concretamente, en este documento se desarrollarán, entre otros temas: la selección del paciente oncológico candidato a la resección quirúrgica y el papel del neurocirujano en el equipo multidisciplinar, la importancia del diagnóstico inmunohistológico y molecular, técnicas quirúrgicas y de RT, actualización de tratamientos de quimioterapia e inmunoterapia y algoritmos de manejo en MC. Con este manuscrito de consenso, el Grupo de Tumores de la Sociedad Española de Neurocirugía (GT- SENEC) expone las cuestiones neuroquirúrgicas más relevantes y los aspectos fundamentales para armonizar el tratamiento multidisciplinar, sobre todo con las especialidades médicas que estén tratando o vayan a abordar a estos pacientes (AU)

Brain metastases are tumors that arise from a tumor cell originated in another organ reaching the brain through the blood. In the brain this tumor cell is capable of growing and invading neighboring tissues, such as the meninges and bone. In most patients a known tumor is present when the brain lesion is diagnosed, although it is possible that the first diagnose is the brain tumor before there is evidence of cancer elsewhere in the body. For this reason, the neurosurgeon must know the management that has shown the greatest benefit for brain metastasis patients, so treatments can be streamlined and optimized. Specifically, in this document, the following topics will be developed: selection of the cancer patient candidate for surgical resection and the role of the neurosurgeon in the multidisciplinary team, the importance of immunohistological and molecular diagnosis, surgical techniques, radiotherapy techniques, treatment updates of chemotherapy and immunotherapy and management algorithms in brain metastases. With this consensus manuscript, the tumor group of the Spanish Society of Neurosurgery (GT-SENEC) exposes the most relevant neurosurgical issues and the fundamental aspects to harmonize multidisciplinary treatment, especially with the medical specialties that are treating or will treat these patients (AU)

Brain metastasis treatment guidelines: consensus by the Spanish Society of Neurosurgery Tumor Section.

Brain metastases are tumors that arise from a tumor cell originated in another organ reaching the brain through the blood. In the brain this tumor cell is capable of growing and invading neighboring tissues, such as the meninges and bone. In most patients a known tumor is present when the brain lesion is diagnosed, although it is possible that the first diagnose is the brain tumor before there is evidence of cancer elsewhere in the body. For this reason, the neurosurgeon must know the management that has shown the greatest benefit for brain metastasis patients, so treatments can be streamlined and optimized. Specifically, in this document, the following topics will be developed: selection of the cancer patient candidate for surgical resection and the role of the neurosurgeon in the multidisciplinary team, the importance of immunohistological and molecular diagnosis, surgical techniques, radiotherapy techniques, treatment updates of chemotherapy and immunotherapy and management algorithms in brain metastases. With this consensus manuscript, the tumor group of the Spanish Society of Neurosurgery (GT-SENEC) exposes the most relevant neurosurgical issues and the fundamental aspects to harmonize multidisciplinary treatment, especially with the medical specialties that are treating or will treat these patients.

Low grade gliomas guide-lines elaborated by the tumor section of Spanish Society of Neurosurgery.

Adult low-grade gliomas (Low Grade Gliomas, LGG) are tumors that originate from the glial cells of the brain and whose management involves great controversy, starting from the diagnosis, to the treatment and subsequent follow-up. For this reason, the Tumor Group of the Spanish Society of Neurosurgery (GT-SENEC) has held a consensus meeting, in which the most relevant neurosurgical issues have been discussed, reaching recommendations based on the best scientific evidence. In order to obtain the maximum benefit from these treatments, an individualised assessment of each patient should be made by a multidisciplinary team. Experts in each LGG treatment field have briefly described it based in their experience and the reviewed of the literature. Each area has been summarized and focused on the best published evidence. LGG have been surrounded by treatment controversy, although during the last years more accurate data has been published in order to reach treatment consensus. Neurosurgeons must know treatment options, indications and risks to participate actively in the decision making and to offer the best surgical treatment in every case.

Oncolytic DNX-2401 Virus for Pediatric Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric patients with diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) have a poor prognosis, with a median survival of less than 1 year. Oncolytic viral therapy has been evaluated in patients with pediatric gliomas elsewhere in the brain, but data regarding oncolytic viral therapy in patients with DIPG are lacking. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, dose-escalation study of DNX-2401, an oncolytic adenovirus that selectively replicates in tumor cells, in patients with newly diagnosed DIPG. The patients received a single virus infusion through a catheter placed in the cerebellar peduncle, followed by radiotherapy. The primary objective was to assess the safety and adverse-event profile of DNX-2401. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the effect of DNX-2401 on overall survival and quality of life, to determine the percentage of patients who have an objective response, and to collect tumor-biopsy and peripheral-blood samples for correlative studies of the molecular features of DIPG and antitumor immune responses. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients, 3 to 18 years of age, with newly diagnosed DIPG received 1×1010 (the first 4 patients) or 5×1010 (the subsequent 8 patients) viral particles of DNX-2401, and 11 received subsequent radiotherapy. Adverse events among the patients included headache, nausea, vomiting, and fatigue. Hemiparesis and tetraparesis developed in 1 patient each. Over a median follow-up of 17.8 months (range, 5.9 to 33.5), a reduction in tumor size, as assessed on magnetic resonance imaging, was reported in 9 patients, a partial response in 3 patients, and stable disease in 8 patients. The median survival was 17.8 months. Two patients were alive at the time of preparation of the current report, 1 of whom was free of tumor progression at 38 months. Examination of a tumor sample obtained during autopsy from 1 patient and peripheral-blood studies revealed alteration of the tumor microenvironment and T-cell repertoire. CONCLUSIONS: Intratumoral infusion of oncolytic virus DNX-2401 followed by radiotherapy in pediatric patients with DIPG resulted in changes in T-cell activity and a reduction in or stabilization of tumor size in some patients but was associated with adverse events. (Funded by the European Research Council under the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program and others; EudraCT number, 2016-001577-33; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03178032.).

Erratum: miR-425-5p, a SOX2 target, regulates the expression of FOXJ3 and RAB31 and promotes the survival of GSCs.

[This corrects the article PMC7470213.].

Ki-67 Proliferative Activity in the Tumor Margins as a Robust Prognosis Factor in Glioblastoma Patients.

INTRODUCTION: The infiltrative margin of glioblastomas (GBM) contains proliferative tumor cells difficult to estimate radiologically as they are included in the hyperintense signal of T2 sequences and they remain in the cavity margin after tumor resection. The amount of these cells could determine overall survival (OS) of these patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From October 2007 to January 2010, patients whose MRI were suggestive of newly diagnosed, resectable high-grade glioma were operated using fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS). Separate samples were selectively taken from nonfluorescent white matter areas just adjacent to the border of the pale fluorescence and staining was made for Ki-67. OS was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression. Multivariate analysis included the following prognosis variables: age, extent of resection (EOR), O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation, and performance status index. RESULTS: Sample included 65 patients, comprising 37 men and 28 women, with a median Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) of 80 (40-100) and mean age of 60 (34-78) years. Mean preoperative tumor volume was 35.8 mL. EOR was 100% in 52 patients (80%), with the lower EOR being 88%. For Ki-67, 39 patients had <5% and 26 had ≥5%. OS was 26.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 18.9-28.2) for the Ki-67 low group versus 15.8 months (95% CI: 7.7-18.2) for the Ki-67 high group (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Proliferative activity in the normal-looking brain around the resection cavity measured with Ki-67 immunostaining is an important independent prognostic factor for GBM cases with complete resection of enhancing tumor. When complete resection is not reached, this factor is not relevant for prognosis.

Consenso sobre guías de tratamiento de los glioblastomas elaborado por el Grupo de Trabajo de Neurooncología (GTNO) de la SENEC / Glioblastoma treatment guidelines: Consensus by the Spanish Society of Neurosurgery Tumor Section

INTRODUCCIÓN: El tratamiento de los glioblastomas (GMB) comienza en la mayor parte de los pacientes con una cirugía, ya sea para la extirpación tumoral, ya sea para la obtención de tejido con el que determinar un diagnóstico histológico. Con el fin de obtener el máximo beneficio de estos tratamientos cada paciente debe ser valorado de forma individualizada por un equipo multidisciplinar, constituido por aquellas especialidades involucradas tanto en el diagnóstico como en el tratamiento. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: El objetivo de este trabajo es elaborar unas recomendaciones de tratamiento para los pacientes con GBM, para lo cual un experto en cada campo ha descrito lo más relevante de dicha área basado tanto en su experiencia como en la literatura. RESULTADOS: Se han desarrollado los distintos apartados sobre el tratamiento de los GBM y al final de cada apartado se concluye la recomendación del GTNO. CONCLUSIONES: A pesar de que los GBM son tumores agresivos y el pronóstico es malo, los pacientes se pueden beneficiar de tratamientos que mejoren no solo la supervivencia global sino también la calidad de vida. El neurocirujano debe conocer las distintas opciones de tratamientos, sus indicaciones y riesgos para poder participar activamente en la toma de decisiones y ofrecer un tratamiento neuroquirúrgico oportuno a cada situación

INTRODUCTION: Glioblastoma (GBM) treatment starts in most patients with surgery, either resection surgery or biopsy, to reach a histology diagnose. Multidisciplinar team, including specialists in brain tumors diagnose and treatment, must make an individualize assessment to get the maximum benefit of the available treatments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Experts in each GBM treatment field have briefly described it based in their experience and the reviewed of the literature. RESULTS: Each area has been summarized and the consensus of the brain tumor group has been included at the end. CONCLUSIONS: GBM are aggressive tumors with a dismal prognosis, however accurate treatments can improve overall survival and quality of life. Neurosurgeons must know treatment options, indications and risks to participate actively in the decision making and to offer the best surgical treatment in every case

miR-425-5p, a SOX2 target, regulates the expression of FOXJ3 and RAB31 and promotes the survival of GSCs.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults and prognosis is poor despite maximum therapeutic efforts. GBM is composed of heterogeneous cell populations, among which the glioma stem-like cells (GSCs) play an important role in tumor cell self-renewal and the ability to initiate and drive tumor growth and recurrence. The transcription factor SOX2 is enriched in GSCs where it controls the stem cell phenotype, invasion and maintenance of tumorigenicity. Therefore, understanding the molecular mechanisms governed by SOX2 in GSCs is crucial to developing targeted therapies against this resistant cell population. In this study, we identified and validated a miRNA profile regulated by SOX2 in GSCs. Among these miRNAs, miR-425-5p emerged as a significant robust candidate for further study. The expression of miR-425-5p was significantly enriched in clinical GBM specimens compared with a human brain reference sample and showed a positive correlation with SOX2 expression. Using a combination of in silico analyses and molecular approaches, we show that SOX2 binds to the promoter of miR-425-5p. Loss of function studies show that repressing miR-425-5p expression in multiple GSCs inhibited neurosphere renewal and induced cell death. More importantly, miR-425-5p inhibition extended survival in an orthotopic GBM mouse model. Finally, combining several bioinformatics platforms with biological endpoints in multiple GSC lines, we identified FOXJ3 and RAB31 as high confidence miR-425-5p target genes. Our findings show that miR-425-5p is a GBM stem cell survival factor and that miR-425-5p inhibition function is a potential strategy for treating GBM.

Perfil clínico y resultados obtenidos en los pacientes tratados mediante implante auditivo del tronco del encéfalo / Clinical Profile and Results Obtained in Patients Treated by Auditory Brainstem Implants

INTRODUCCIÓN: Los implantes cocleares han paliado algunas hipoacusias, pero las relacionadas con alteraciones del nervio coclear obligaron a buscar nuevas formas de tratamiento, dando lugar a los implantes auditivos del tronco cerebral (IATC). OBJETIVOS: Exponer el perfil clínico de los pacientes tratados mediante un IATC y los resultados entre los años 1997 y 2017. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se seleccionaron por un lado pacientes con tumores del nervio estatoacústico (VIII par craneal) y por otro lado pacientes sin tumores del VIII con malformaciones congénitas del oído interno. Previa y posteriormente a la colocación del IATC se evaluó la audición a través de audiometría tonal liminar, de la que se obtuvo el umbral tonal medio (UTM) y de la escala de rendimiento auditivo Categories Auditory Performance (CAP). RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron un total de 20 pacientes sometidos a una cirugía de IATC. Ocho de los casos fueron de causa tumoral (40%) y 12 no tumorales (60%). En 15 sujetos (75%) se realizó abordaje suboccipital y en 5 (25%) translaberíntico. La media de electrodos activos al inicio en los implantes de la casa comercial Cochlear® (Nucleus ABI24), la cual tiene un total de 21 electrodos, fue de 13 (61,90%) frente a 8,5 (70,83%) de los 12 electrodos que presenta el implante de la casa Med-el® (ABI Med-el). Se comprobó una mejora en el UTM medio de 118,49dB basal frente a 46,55 dB a los 2 años. En la escala CAP se parte en todos los casos de un valor de1, y en la revisión a los 2 años, de 2,57 (1-5). CONCLUSIÓN: Concluimos que el IATC es una opción segura y con buenos resultados auditivos cuando la indicación se hace de manera correcta

INTRODUCTION: Cochlear implants have been able to treat some types of hearing loss, but those related to cochlear nerve impairment made it necessary to find new ways to manage these deficits; leading to auditory brainstem implants (ABI). AIM: Our objective is to present the clinical profile of patients treated through an ABI and the results obtained from 1997 to 2017. MATERIAL AND METHODS: On the one hand, patients with statoacoustic nerve tumours (VIII cranial nerve) were selected, and on the other hand, patients withoutVIII tumours with congenital malformations of the inner ear. Before and after the placement of the ABI, hearing was assessed through tonal audiometry, from which the PTA (Pure Tone Average) and the CAP (Categories of Auditory Performance) scale were obtained. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients undergoing ABI surgery were included. Eight were of tumour cause (40%) and 12 non-tumour (60%). In 15 subjects (75%) a suboccipital approach was performed and in 5 (25%) translabyrinthine. The mean of active electrodes before the implantation of Cochlear® (Nucleus ABI24) was 13/21 (61.90%) versus 8.5/12 (70.83%) of the Med-el® (ABI Med-el). An improvement in the mean PTA of 118.49 dB was found against 46.55dB at 2 years. On the CAP scale, values of1 were obtained in the preimplantation and of 2.57 (1-5) in the 2-year revision. CONCLUSION: The ABI is a safe option, and with good hearing results when the indication is made correctly

Imagen intraoperatoria en el quirófano de neurocirugía: revisión de las técnicas más empleadas para la cirugía de los tumores cerebrales / Intraoperative imaging in the neurosurgery operating theatre: A review of the most commonly used techniques for brain tumour surgery

INTRODUCCIÓN: La cirugía de los tumores cerebrales se ha implementado en los últimos años con nuevas técnicas de imagen intraoperatoria, que tratan de mejorar la resección tumoral, aunque conllevan un aumento de recursos. Con el fin de hacer una actualización de este tema, se ha elaborado este manuscrito desde el grupo de tumores de la Sociedad Española de Neurocirugía. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se ha propuesto a expertos en el uso de cada una de las técnicas intraoperatorias más empleadas en la cirugía de los tumores cerebrales, la descripción de la técnica y una breve revisión de la literatura. Se describirán indicaciones de uso, sus ventajas e inconvenientes basados en la experiencia clínica y en lo publicado en la literatura. RESULTADOS: La técnica de imagen intraoperatoria más consistente sería la resonancia de bajo y alto campo, pero a su vez es la que supone un mayor gasto de recursos. La ecografía intraoperatoria navegada es portátil y tiene un menor coste, aunque discrimina peor los tumores de alto grado y es observador-dependiente. Las técnicas de fluorescencia más empleadas son el 5-aminolevulínico para gliomas de alto grado y la fluoresceína, de utilidad en lesiones que rompen la barrera hematoencefálica. Por último, la TAC intraoperatoria es la más versátil en el quirófano de neurocirugía, pero tiene menos indicaciones en la cirugía neurooncológica. CONCLUSIONES: Las técnicas de imagen intraoperatoria se emplean cada vez con más frecuencia en la cirugía de los tumores cerebrales, y el neurocirujano debe valorar su posible uso en función de sus recursos y las necesidades de cada paciente

INTRODUCTION: New intraoperative imaging techniques, which aim to improve tumour resection, have been implemented in recent years in brain tumour surgery, although they lead to an increase in resources. In order to carry out an update on this topic, this manuscript has been drafted by a group from the Sociedad Española de Neurocirugía (Spanish Society of Neurosurgery). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Experts in the use of each one of the most-used intraoperative techniques in brain tumour surgery were presented with a description of the technique and a brief review of the literature. Indications for use, their advantages and disadvantages based on clinical experience and on what is published in the literature will be described. RESULTS: The most robust intraoperative imaging technique appears to be low- and high-field magnetic resonance imaging, but this is the technique which results in the greatest expenditure. Intraoperative ultrasound navigation is portable and less expensive, but it provides poorer differentiation of high-grade tumours and is observer-dependent. The most-used fluorescence techniques are 5-aminolevulinic acid for high-grade gliomas and fluorescein, useful in lesions which rupture the blood-brain barrier. Last of all, intraoperative CT is more versatile in the neurosurgery operating theatre, but it has fewer indications in neuro-oncology surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative imaging techniques are used with increasingly greater frequency in brain tumour surgery, and the neurosurgeon should assess their possible use depending on their resources and the needs of each patient

RNU6-1 in circulating exosomes differentiates GBM from non-neoplastic brain lesions and PCNSL but not from brain metastases.

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults. Circulating biomarkers may assist in the processes of differential diagnosis and response assessment. GBM cells release extracellular vesicles containing a subset of proteins and nucleic acids. We previously demonstrated that exosomes isolated from the serum of GBM patients had an increased expression of RNU6-1 compared to healthy subjects. In this exploratory study, we investigated the role of this small noncoding RNA as a diagnostic biomarker for GBM versus other brain lesions with some potential radiological similarities. METHODS: We analyzed the expression of RNU6-1 in circulating exosomes of GBM patients (n = 18), healthy controls (n = 30), and patients with subacute stroke (n = 30), acute/subacute hemorrhage (n = 30), acute demyelinating lesions (n = 18), brain metastases (n = 21), and primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL; n = 12) using digital droplet PCR. RESULTS: Expression of RNU6-1 was significantly higher in GBM patients than in healthy controls (P = .002). RNU6-1 levels were also significantly higher in exosomes from GBM patients than from patients with non-neoplastic lesions (stroke [P = .05], hemorrhage [P = .01], demyelinating lesions [P = .019]) and PCNSL (P = .004). In contrast, no significant differences were found between patients with GBM and brain metastases (P = .573). Receiver operator characteristic curve analyses supported the role of this biomarker in differentiating GBM from subacute stroke, acute/subacute hemorrhage, acute demyelinating lesions, and PCNSL (P < .05), but again not from brain metastases (P = .575). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the expression of RNU6-1 in circulating exosomes could be useful for the differentiation of GBM from non-neoplastic brain lesions and PCNSL, but not from brain metastases.

Glioblastoma treatment guidelines: Consensus by the Spanish Society of Neurosurgery Tumor Section. / Consenso sobre guías de tratamiento de los glioblastomas elaborado por el Grupo de Trabajo de Neurooncología (GTNO) de la SENEC.

INTRODUCTION: Glioblastoma (GBM) treatment starts in most patients with surgery, either resection surgery or biopsy, to reach a histology diagnose. Multidisciplinar team, including specialists in brain tumors diagnose and treatment, must make an individualize assessment to get the maximum benefit of the available treatments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Experts in each GBM treatment field have briefly described it based in their experience and the reviewed of the literature. RESULTS: Each area has been summarized and the consensus of the brain tumor group has been included at the end. CONCLUSIONS: GBM are aggressive tumors with a dismal prognosis, however accurate treatments can improve overall survival and quality of life. Neurosurgeons must know treatment options, indications and risks to participate actively in the decision making and to offer the best surgical treatment in every case.

Clinical Profile and Results Obtained in Patients Treated by Auditory Brainstem Implants. / Perfil clínico y resultados obtenidos en los pacientes tratados mediante implante auditivo del tronco del encéfalo.

INTRODUCTION: Cochlear implants have been able to treat some types of hearing loss, but those related to cochlear nerve impairment made it necessary to find new ways to manage these deficits; leading to auditory brainstem implants (ABI). AIM: Our objective is to present the clinical profile of patients treated through an ABI and the results obtained from 1997 to 2017. MATERIAL AND METHODS: On the one hand, patients with statoacoustic nerve tumours (VIIIcranial nerve) were selected, and on the other hand, patients withoutVIII tumours with congenital malformations of the inner ear. Before and after the placement of the ABI, hearing was assessed through tonal audiometry, from which the PTA (Pure Tone Average) and the CAP (Categories of Auditory Performance) scale were obtained. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients undergoing ABI surgery were included. Eight were of tumour cause (40%) and 12 non-tumour (60%). In 15 subjects (75%) a suboccipital approach was performed and in 5 (25%) translabyrinthine. The mean of active electrodes before the implantation of Cochlear® (Nucleus ABI24) was 13/21 (61.90%) versus 8.5/12 (70.83%) of the Med-el® (ABI Med-el). An improvement in the mean PTA of 118.49dB was found against 46.55dB at 2years. On the CAP scale, values of1 were obtained in the preimplantation and of 2.57 (1-5) in the 2-year revision. CONCLUSION: The ABI is a safe option, and with good hearing results when the indication is made correctly.

Intraoperative imaging in the neurosurgery operating theatre: A review of the most commonly used techniques for brain tumour surgery. / Imagen intraoperatoria en el quirófano de neurocirugía: revisión de las técnicas más empleadas para la cirugía de los tumores cerebrales.

INTRODUCTION: New intraoperative imaging techniques, which aim to improve tumour resection, have been implemented in recent years in brain tumour surgery, although they lead to an increase in resources. In order to carry out an update on this topic, this manuscript has been drafted by a group from the Sociedad Española de Neurocirugía (Spanish Society of Neurosurgery). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Experts in the use of each one of the most-used intraoperative techniques in brain tumour surgery were presented with a description of the technique and a brief review of the literature. Indications for use, their advantages and disadvantages based on clinical experience and on what is published in the literature will be described. RESULTS: The most robust intraoperative imaging technique appears to be low- and high-field magnetic resonance imaging, but this is the technique which results in the greatest expenditure. Intraoperative ultrasound navigation is portable and less expensive, but it provides poorer differentiation of high-grade tumours and is observer-dependent. The most-used fluorescence techniques are 5-aminolevulinic acid for high-grade gliomas and fluorescein, useful in lesions which rupture the blood-brain barrier. Last of all, intraoperative CT is more versatile in the neurosurgery operating theatre, but it has fewer indications in neuro-oncology surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative imaging techniques are used with increasingly greater frequency in brain tumour surgery, and the neurosurgeon should assess their possible use depending on their resources and the needs of each patient.

Correction: Hypofractionated radiation therapy and temozolomide in patients with glioblastoma and poor prognostic factors. A prospective, single-institution experience.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217881.].

Hypofractionated radiation therapy and temozolomide in patients with glioblastoma and poor prognostic factors. A prospective, single-institution experience.

BACKGROUND: Hypofractionated radiation therapy is a feasible and safe treatment option in elderly and frail patients with glioblastoma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of hypofractionated radiation therapy with concurrent temozolomide in terms of feasibility and disease control in primary glioblastoma patients with poor prognostic factors other than advanced age, such as post-surgical neurological complications, high tumor burden, unresectable or multifocal lesions, and potential low treatment compliance due to social factors or rapidly progressive disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: GTV included the surgical cavity plus disease visible in T1WI-MRI, FLAIR-MRI and in the MET-uptake. The CTV was defined as the GTV plus 1.5-2 cm margin; the PTV was the CTV+0.3 cm margin. Forty, fourty-five, and fifty grays in 15 fractions were prescribed to 95% of PTV, CTV, and GTV, respectively. Treatment was delivered using IMRT or the VMAT technique. Simultaneously, 75 mg/m2/day of temozolomide were administered. RESULTS: Between January 2010 and November 2017, we treated a total of 17 patients. The median age at diagnosis was 68-years; median KPS was 50-70%. MGMT-methylation status was negative in 5 patients, and 8 patients were IDH-wildtype. Eight of 18 patients were younger than 65-years. Median tumor volume was 26.95cc; median PTV volume was 322cc. Four lesions were unresectable; 6 patients underwent complete surgical resection. Median residual volume was 1.14cc. Progression-free survival was 60% at 6 months, 33% at 1-year and 13% at 2-years (median OS = 7 months). No acute grade 3-5 toxicities were documented. Symptomatic grade 3 radiation necrosis was observed in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with poor clinical factors other than advanced age can be selected for hypofractionated radiotherapy. The OS and PFS rates obtained in our series are similar to those in patients treated with standard fractionation, assuring good treatment adherence, low rates of toxicity and probable improved cost-effectiveness.

The oncolytic virus Delta-24-RGD elicits an antitumor effect in pediatric glioma and DIPG mouse models.

Pediatric high-grade glioma (pHGG) and diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPGs) are aggressive pediatric brain tumors in desperate need of a curative treatment. Oncolytic virotherapy is emerging as a solid therapeutic approach. Delta-24-RGD is a replication competent adenovirus engineered to replicate in tumor cells with an aberrant RB pathway. This virus has proven to be safe and effective in adult gliomas. Here we report that the administration of Delta-24-RGD is safe in mice and results in a significant increase in survival in immunodeficient and immunocompetent models of pHGG and DIPGs. Our results show that the Delta-24-RGD antiglioma effect is mediated by the oncolytic effect and the immune response elicited against the tumor. Altogether, our data highlight the potential of this virus as treatment for patients with these tumors. Of clinical significance, these data have led to the start of a phase I/II clinical trial at our institution for newly diagnosed DIPG (NCT03178032).

Delta-24-RGD combined with radiotherapy exerts a potent antitumor effect in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma and pediatric high grade glioma models.

Pediatric high grade gliomas (pHGG), including diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPGs), are aggressive tumors with a dismal outcome. Radiotherapy (RT) is part of the standard of care of these tumors; however, radiotherapy only leads to a transient clinical improvement. Delta-24-RGD is a genetically engineered tumor-selective adenovirus that has shown safety and clinical efficacy in adults with recurrent gliomas. In this work, we evaluated the feasibility, safety and therapeutic efficacy of Delta-24-RGD in combination with radiotherapy in pHGGs and DIPGs models. Our results showed that the combination of Delta-24-RGD with radiotherapy was feasible and resulted in a synergistic anti-glioma effect in vitro and in vivo in pHGG and DIPG models. Interestingly, Delta-24-RGD treatment led to the downregulation of relevant DNA damage repair proteins, further sensitizing tumors cells to the effect of radiotherapy. Additionally, Delta-24-RGD/radiotherapy treatment significantly increased the trafficking of immune cells (CD3, CD4+ and CD8+) to the tumor niche compared with single treatments. In summary, administration of the Delta-24-RGD/radiotherapy combination to pHGG and DIPG models is safe and significantly increases the overall survival of mice bearing these tumors. Our data offer a rationale for the combination Delta-24-RGD/radiotherapy as a therapeutic option for children with these tumors. SIGNIFICANCE: Delta-24-RGD/radiotherapy administration is safe and significantly increases the survival of treated mice. These positive data underscore the urge to translate this approach to the clinical treatment of children with pHGG and DIPGs.

Neoadjuvant nivolumab modifies the tumor immune microenvironment in resectable glioblastoma.

Glioblastoma is the most common primary central nervous system malignancy and has a poor prognosis. Standard first-line treatment, which includes surgery followed by adjuvant radio-chemotherapy, produces only modest benefits to survival1,2. Here, to explore the feasibility, safety and immunobiological effects of PD-1 blockade in patients undergoing surgery for glioblastoma, we conducted a single-arm phase II clinical trial (NCT02550249) in which we tested a presurgical dose of nivolumab followed by postsurgical nivolumab until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity in 30 patients (27 salvage surgeries for recurrent cases and 3 cases of primary surgery for newly diagnosed patients). Availability of tumor tissue pre- and post-nivolumab dosing and from additional patients who did not receive nivolumab allowed the evaluation of changes in the tumor immune microenvironment using multiple molecular and cellular analyses. Neoadjuvant nivolumab resulted in enhanced expression of chemokine transcripts, higher immune cell infiltration and augmented TCR clonal diversity among tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes, supporting a local immunomodulatory effect of treatment. Although no obvious clinical benefit was substantiated following salvage surgery, two of the three patients treated with nivolumab before and after primary surgery remain alive 33 and 28 months later.